a logger package, and preferably use a specialized factory, which
can provide better integration with the real logger.
The introspection is ok, but it's limited and complex.
Also, switch to SimpleLog by default - which is almost the same as
using System.err.println(). If common logging requires the user to set
properties and configurations to get the same behavior as System.err(),
why would anyone use it ?
git-svn-id: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/jakarta/commons/proper/logging/trunk@138867 13f79535-47bb-0310-9956-ffa450edef68
to the logger impl, without introspection. The factory can be extended
to take advantage of other log4j features ( it calls getInstance(Class)
direclty for example ) to integrate better.
git-svn-id: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/jakarta/commons/proper/logging/trunk@138865 13f79535-47bb-0310-9956-ffa450edef68
to use the standards ( if it makes sense ), and that's something that
works well enough ( crimson, xerces, xalan, saxon, etc).
Changed the code that deals with 'properties'-based setup. The propertis
will be set on the factory regardless of the discovery mechanism.
This may be arguable, but at least it's symetrical and permits the
application to pass the information to the logger implementation in
all cases. Given that the properties are read by the class loader,
each application can have it's own settings (even if
the admin sets a JVM-wide default by using a system property ).
git-svn-id: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/jakarta/commons/proper/logging/trunk@138862 13f79535-47bb-0310-9956-ffa450edef68
Costin Manolache