Add better reporting when jdk14 handler setup isn't right.
git-svn-id: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/jakarta/commons/proper/logging/trunk@177867 13f79535-47bb-0310-9956-ffa450edef68
This commit is contained in:
@@ -276,11 +276,25 @@ public class CustomConfigTestCase extends DefaultConfigTestCase {
|
||||
parent = parent.getParent();
|
||||
}
|
||||
handlers = parent.getHandlers();
|
||||
if ((handlers != null) && (handlers.length == 1) &&
|
||||
(handlers[0] instanceof TestHandler)) {
|
||||
|
||||
// The CustomConfig.properties file explicitly defines one handler class
|
||||
// to be attached to the root logger, so if it isn't there then
|
||||
// something is badly wrong...
|
||||
//
|
||||
// Yes this testing is also done in testPristineHandlers but
|
||||
// unfortunately:
|
||||
// * we need to set up the handlers variable here,
|
||||
// * we don't want that to be set up incorrectly, as that can
|
||||
// produce weird error messages in other tests, and
|
||||
// * we can't rely on testPristineHandlers being the first
|
||||
// test to run.
|
||||
// so we need to test things here too.
|
||||
assertNotNull("No Handlers defined for JDK14 logging", handlers);
|
||||
assertEquals("Unexpected number of handlers for JDK14 logging", 1, handlers.length);
|
||||
assertNotNull("Handler is null", handlers[0]);
|
||||
assertTrue("Handler not of expected type", handlers[0] instanceof TestHandler);
|
||||
handler = (TestHandler) handlers[0];
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
// Set up logger instance
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user